Obama’s Coalition v. Romney’s…in 1916 — Marginal Counterrevolution

Counties that went third party (socialist and prohibition) in 1916, all of which went for Romney, are not pictured as part of the Romney coalition. The solid Blue in the South is mostly voter suppression and lack of Mexicanization. Colorado was much more rural and non-Hispanic in 1916. Same for northern Ohio. Actual map of […]

via Obama’s Coalition v. Romney’s…in 1916 — Marginal Counterrevolution

Advertisements

One thought on “Obama’s Coalition v. Romney’s…in 1916 — Marginal Counterrevolution

  1. BTW, man, I was born in Russia. The criteria you posted only have a modest impact on my decisions, as Britain bans both Bob Spencer and Pam Geller from entering the country. This demonstrates a pretty repressive regime, especially in a so-called “democracy”. Air pollution of various kinds is Russia’s second-biggest problem. Belarus’ is more orderly than Russia, but is poorer and more tyrannical. I’ve been there.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s